AI Governance
Data Centers
Drones
Climate
Privacy
2026 Maine Senate
Bob Dylan
Colleton’s Data Center Fight Moves From Objections to Exclusion
Colleton County agreed to exclude data centers from much of its ACE Basin territory, including the site proposed for Eagle Rock Partners’ 1,000-MW campus. Yesterday’s reporting showed a consequential change: residents’ zoning challenge has produced a settlement requiring the county to restrict where development can occur.
The planning amendment still needs to be implemented, and the campus has not been shown to be formally canceled. Elsewhere, Google’s Palo proposal moved toward public discussion and Kansas opposition gained statewide political visibility—different stages of development and resistance, not a single sector-wide turn.
The Colleton settlement creates a concrete obstacle for a large proposed campus. Bluffton Today reported that the exclusion area includes Eagle Rock Partners’ approximately 859-acre site. The agreement resolves residents’ challenge to zoning changes allowing rural data centers through special exceptions. It does not prohibit data centers across the entire county, but it commits officials to removing sensitive territory from the development map.
Google scheduled an October 22 public meeting for its proposed 545-acre campus in Palo, Iowa. Corridor Business reported that the company intends to seek voluntary annexation but has not filed the application. That distinction matters: public engagement is advancing, while the jurisdictional and approval path remains unsettled. Palo and Linn County have different water provisions, and Google plans evaporative cooling.
Kansas’s data-center debate is widening beyond individual resource disputes. Yesterday’s reporting described Democratic gubernatorial nominee Cindy Holscher’s call for a temporary construction pause and Republican nominee Ty Masterson’s preference for existing safeguards and local decisions. Emporia residents have also qualified November measures restricting high-impact data centers and battery storage for ten years, subject to legal challenges. Neither a statewide pause nor those local restrictions has been enacted.
Power-delay estimates added scale to an existing concern rather than documenting a new disruption. Currence estimates electricity shortages could delay 30%–50% of large data-center capacity expected online in 2026. The available reporting does not provide the methodology or project-level corroboration needed to treat that range as a verified delivery forecast.
Key Points
- Opposition matters most when it changes the rules governing a site. Recent briefings described requests for additional review and proposed restrictions; Colleton now offers a settlement requiring a specific planning action. Kansas shows broader political reach, but not yet the same level of implementation certainty.
- Google’s proposal illustrates why a power arrangement is not the same as a delivery-ready project. Reported agreements involve local cooperatives and a 25-year NextEra agreement tied to a possible plant restart, while electricity demand and schedule remain undisclosed. This continues the recent distinction between nominal power capacity and practical readiness.
Implications
For site developers and investors, Colleton’s settlement changes more than the timetable: it threatens the proposed location’s eligibility. Underwriting should distinguish that kind of land-use obstacle from additional hearings, unfiled applications or campaign proposals.
Palo’s annexation path could determine which water requirements apply. Until resource demand, power-delivery conditions and timing are clearer, neither the public meeting nor the reported power arrangements establish that the campus can proceed on an executable schedule.
Watchpoints
Watch
Colleton County’s adoption of the planning amendment, the exclusion area’s final boundaries and Eagle Rock Partners’ response.
Watch
Google’s October 22 meeting: whether it clarifies water demand, electricity requirements and timing, followed by an annexation filing and clearer power-delivery conditions.
Watch
Legal rulings on Emporia’s ballot measures, November voting and whether Kansas’s proposed construction pause becomes a formal policy proposal.
Watch
Project-level evidence supporting the capacity-delay estimates, including which scheduled facilities are delayed and whether electricity shortages explain those delays.
Fallout
The strongest change is a specific land-use commitment in Colleton County. Palo remains an early-stage proposal, Kansas faces political and ballot uncertainty, and broad power-delay estimates still require verification.
Colleton County Site Eligibility
The settlement would restrict development across much of the county’s ACE Basin territory, including an identified major campus site.
Fresh developments
Bluffton Today reported that Colleton County agreed to establish a data-center exclusion area encompassing Eagle Rock Partners’ approximately 859-acre, 1,000-MW proposal.
Why we noticed
Residents’ opposition has secured a required planning action rather than simply another review. Implementation remains outstanding, so exclusion should not be confused with a completed amendment or formal project cancellation.
Watch for:
- Adoption and final boundaries of the exclusion area.
- The developer’s response and any resulting change to the proposal.
Google’s Palo Approval and Resource Path
Public engagement is moving forward, but annexation, resource requirements and power-delivery timing remain unresolved.
Fresh developments
Corridor Business reported an October 22 meeting for Google’s proposed 545-acre campus. The voluntary annexation application has not been filed; evaporative cooling and power arrangements were described.
Why we noticed
Annexation would determine the applicable local framework, including differing water provisions. A possible plant restart remains a dependency in the reported power arrangements.
Watch for:
- An annexation filing and disclosure of water and electricity demand.
- Clarification of project timing and conditions for power delivery.
Kansas Political and Ballot Restrictions
Data-center opposition is entering statewide policy debate while local voters may gain a direct role in restrictions.
Fresh developments
Reporting described competing gubernatorial positions on a construction pause and qualified November ballot measures in Emporia, which face legal challenges.
Why we noticed
Recent coverage focused on Kansas project-level water questions. The current debate broadens the potential consequences to statewide policy and voter-driven limits, without establishing that either has taken effect.
Watch for:
- Legal decisions affecting Emporia’s measures and the November vote.
- Any formal proposal translating the campaign’s moratorium position into policy.
Power Constraints and Capacity Forecasts
Estimated power-related delays reinforce the need to separate scheduled capacity from deliverable capacity.
Fresh developments
Currence’s estimate puts potential delays at 30%–50% of large data-center capacity expected online in 2026. Morgan Stanley uses infrastructure constraints in its investment case for Nvidia.
Why we noticed
The estimates matter for delivery assumptions, but investment analysis is not evidence of operational outcomes. Without methodology and project-level validation, the delay range should inform scrutiny rather than become a settled forecast.
Watch for:
- Underlying measurement dates and methodology.
- Identified project delays and evidence linking them to power shortages.
Final Thought
Yesterday sharpened the distinction between scrutiny and constraint. Colleton has committed to changing site eligibility; elsewhere, political positions, project outreach and capacity forecasts still await decisions or evidence that determine their practical effect.