Federal Data Center PolicyFederal Data Center PolicyCoverage from The Washington Times, GovInfo, and others
00/00/0000
DailyWeekly
Federal data-center policy addresses the infrastructure demands and wider impacts of large facilities, including electricity use, grid capacity, cost allocation, siting, taxation, disclosure, and standards.
One prominent example is the Ratepayer Protection Act: after passing the House 417–3, it would direct state utility regulators to consider requiring data centers and other large electricity users to cover grid-upgrade costs and provide financial assurances. These debates connect federal policymaking with state utility regulation and questions about who should bear the costs of new power demand. The scope also includes other federal policy approaches to data-center impacts.
It supplies quantified context on rising electricity and water demand that helps explain why grid-cost allocation has become a policy issue.
Yahoo Tech
Key Issues
01
Federal ratepayer protections remain stalled
The Ratepayer Protection Act passed the House but was blocked from advancing in the Senate, leaving its state-led framework unadopted. Other federal approaches are proposed, but the evidence does not show a replacement framework in force.
Stable
Drawn from 3 articles
02
State cost protections are more direct but uneven
State efforts and proposals include dedicated tariffs and assigning large data centers costs attributable to their demand. Coverage and requirements vary, while federal proposals generally preserve substantial state discretion.
Strengthening
Drawn from 3 articles
03
Rising resource demand pressures infrastructure
Reported data-center electricity and water use is rising, with further growth projected. These demands intensify grid-planning and cost-allocation pressures, including questions about who pays for supporting infrastructure.
Stable
Drawn from 3 articles
04
Cost proposals include safeguards against project exit
Some proposals combine assigning infrastructure costs to large users with financial assurances, long-term payment commitments, or exit protections. These safeguards are proposed in several approaches, not established as uniform requirements.
Stable
Drawn from 3 articles
Key Numbers
417-3
House vote on the Ratepayer Protection Act
“The Ratepayer Protection Act passed the House 417-3. It would require state utility regulators to consider a federal standard under which large data centers cover the additional costs of grid upgrades. New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich blocked an attempt to fast-track the bill in the Senate, arguing that it does not go far enough.”
Yahoo Tech and 4 other articles
417-3
House vote
Ratepayer Protection Act
“The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in a 417-3 vote, advancing the first major federal data center bill as lawmakers confront concerns about affordability, energy costs and grid infrastructure tied to the artificial intelligence boom.”
Fox News and 1 other article
21 billion liters
direct U.S. data-center water consumption
United States · 2014
“A 2024 Berkeley Lab report estimated that U.S. data centers directly consumed 21 billion liters of water in 2014 and 66 billion liters in 2023.”
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
50 megawatts
threshold for a facility to qualify as a data center under the Rhode Island bills
projected or actual demand
“Both define a data center as a facility with projected or actual demand of at least 50 megawatts—half the federal threshold.”
UpriseRI
17 billion gallons
water directly consumed by U.S. data centers
estimated · 2023
“U.S. data centers directly consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water in 2023, according to a July Congressional Research Service report. About 97% of that water came from public water systems, while some facilities self-source water from surface water or groundwater.”
The Washington Times
Contested Issue
1 open dispute
Should data-center grid-cost protections rely on state consideration and discretion, or require stronger, enforceable payment and financial safeguards?
The Ratepayer Protection Act would prompt states to consider assigning incremental grid costs to large data centers while leaving adoption and rate-setting to state regulators. Other positions argue that state consideration alone is insufficient and call for more direct payment requirements and safeguards against stranded costs.
State-led consideration
3 articles · across 3 publications
A federal framework should prompt states to consider assigning incremental grid costs to large data centers while allowing regulators to decide whether and how to adopt the standard.
Stronger enforceable safeguards
4 articles · across 4 publications
State consideration alone is insufficient; large data centers should face more direct requirements to pay attributable grid costs, with financial or contractual protections against stranded costs.
Looking Back
166 Day Timeline
Articles published over time. Hover any bar for the period and its article count.
May 18
Jun 14
Jul 8
Aug 4
Aug 28
Sep 24
Oct 18
The Story So Far
No material change
No material change: the new article reiterates the House bill’s approach of assigning data-center power and transmission costs to customers while leaving implementation to state regulators.
Previously
Federal and state policy efforts are increasingly addressing whether large data-center customers should pay for the generation and grid upgrades their demand requires. The House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act, but the Senate blocked it; other proposals and state tariff actions continue, with differing thresholds, enforcement, and allocations of authority.
History
10/23/2026
The debate has broadened beyond the blocked House bill: separate federal proposals and state tariff efforts are pursuing different ways to allocate data-center power costs. This shows the issue remains active across multiple policy channels, despite the original federal framework’s failure to advance.
10/05/2026
The Senate’s stalled consideration is now specified as a vote on October 1 that failed to reach the 60-vote threshold, formally blocking the bill from advancing.
House lawmakers are considering the Water Cost Accountability Act in Washington, D.C., to require large data centers to pay incremental public water-system costs and disclose water sourcing.
Representatives Hillary Scholten and Suhas Subramanyam introduced a bill requiring water-resource protections for new data centers in the United States Congress.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee plans to hold a hearing in the United States on legislation that would require data center owners to pay related water infrastructure costs.
Food & Water Watch warned that data centers using behind-the-meter generation could raise pollution, water stress, and utility costs for nearby communities in the United States.
On May 13, Senators Ben Ray Luján and Katie Britt introduced the Advancing Water Reuse Act, proposing federal tax incentives for onsite water recycling, including at data center facilities.
Congress considered two bills governing infrastructure costs for large data centers in the United States, with the GRID Savings Act proposing mandatory FERC oversight of interstate grid connections.
Senator Tom Cotton proposed the DATA Act in the U.S. Senate to accelerate data-center power development by removing federal environmental, interconnection, cost-allocation, and reliability requirements.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans introduced the POWER Act on permitting, interconnection priorities, and ratepayer protections tied to AI data center electricity demand.
The U.S. House advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington on Wednesday, directing states to consider making large data centers pay for grid upgrades serving their facilities.
9/17/2026 • Power Procurement & Grid • General
Tax Foundation / Andrew Lautz, Richard DiSalvo, Garrett Watson55
In the United States in July and August 2026, Mark Warner and Ron Wyden proposed taxes and depreciation restrictions targeting AI data center investment.
8/13/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
National Association of Counties / Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart51
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on September 16, 2026, and senators introduced the American Affordability and Jobs Act on September 30 as Congress considered national rules for data center electricity costs.
Republican lawmakers and candidates have proposed ratepayer protections, construction pauses, and zoning safeguards in recent U.S. debates over data center expansion.
9/29/2026 • Community & Local Opposition • General
Congressman Eugene Vindman supported H.R. 9340 in Washington, D.C., seeking to require large data centers to finance grid upgrades associated with their power demand.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on a 417-3 vote in Washington, directing state regulators to consider assigning data center grid costs to operators.
9/16/2026 • Community & Local Opposition • General
Sen. Ron Wyden released an August 6 Senate Finance Committee framework proposing construction incentive removals and an AI data center excise tax in the United States.
Ron Wyden proposed a federal gross-revenue tax on data centers that modeling indicates could eliminate pretax profits in Santa Clara County and other jurisdictions.
Congressional lawmakers advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act in 2026 to require large data center power consumers to fund grid costs and conserve water amid Ohio community concerns.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington on Tuesday, while Senate action stalled over requirements for data centers to cover added power infrastructure costs.
Food and Water Watch and Center for Biological Diversity oppose the Ratepayer Protection Act after House subcommittee movement in mid-June, citing weak consumer protections and faster AI datacenter buildout.
Republican lawmakers and candidates across the United States called for data-center limits during midterm campaigns, citing electricity costs, grid strain, and local zoning concerns.
9/29/2026 • Community & Local Opposition • General
In recent months, Republican lawmakers and candidates in several U.S. states proposed data center limits to address power costs, grid strain, and local control concerns.
9/29/2026 • Community & Local Opposition • General
The Senate on Thursday failed to advance data-center cost legislation after Martin Heinrich objected in Washington, while federal officials identified potential AI data-center sites on public land.
On September 30, 2026, four U.S. senators urged NARUC to develop large-data-center rate protections for residential and small-business customers across the United States.
The U.S. House passed H.R. 9340 in Washington, and the Senate blocked unanimous-consent passage the next day, leaving states to consider cost-allocation standards for large data centers.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on Sept. 16 in Washington, D.C., seeking to make large data center operators fund associated power infrastructure.
U.S. lawmakers and communities are challenging rapid data center construction nationwide over electricity infrastructure costs, water demand, and local effects.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on Thursday, potentially shifting data-center grid upgrade costs to hyperscalers and increasing interest in dedicated generation from Oklo and NuScale.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Ratepayer Protection Act, which would require data center operators to fund electricity infrastructure upgrades and could encourage behind-the-meter generation.
The U.S. Senate blocked Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act during a work period after Martin Heinrich objected, leaving data center grid cost rules unresolved.
Rep. Andrea Salinas introduced the Data Center Community Reinvestment Act of 2026 in Washington, proposing a nationwide electricity tax for qualifying data centers.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously advanced H.R. 9340 during a congressional markup, narrowing federal ratepayer legislation to data centers.
House Energy and Commerce Committee advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act, setting federal rules for state regulators handling 100-megawatt-plus customer proposals and grid upgrade cost charges.
House Energy and Commerce Committee narrowed the Ratepayer Protection Act (H.R. 9340) to data centers during a Monday-Tuesday markup, proposing states adopt a cost standard for generation and transmission upgrades.
On July 21, 2026, Congresswoman Lori Trahan backed two bipartisan bills advanced in a House Energy and Commerce Committee markup to prevent residential electricity cost pass-through from large AI data centers.
House Energy and Commerce Committee plans a vote on H.R. 9340 Ratepayer Protection Act this week in Washington, DC to shift data-center power costs for grid upgrades onto large electricity customers.
House Energy and Commerce leaders advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act, which would push states toward a large load standard charging data center developers for grid upgrades.
Suhas Subramanyam advanced H.R. 9372 to the House floor after a 34-1 Science, Space, and Technology Committee vote would set NIST data center energy and water measurement standards.
Kathy Castor and Gabe Evans introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act in the U.S. House to require 100MW data centers to fund needed grid and generation upgrades.
Kathy Castor and Gabe Evans filed the Ratepayer Protection Act directing Colorado and state regulators to require large-load data centers, 100+ megawatts, to fund grid upgrades needed for service.
Senator Cynthia Lummis introduced the POWER Up Act in the US to direct FERC to standardize transmission interconnection rules for 100MW-plus data center loads within 18 months.
Senator Mark Warner backed the Power for the People Act in response to Virginia electricity price impacts from data-center growth tied to PJM reliability and utility cost allocation.
Chip Roy filed the POWER Act to require DOE and EPA to report water and energy use for expedited-permitted, high-load data centers under Executive Order 14318.
Senator Adam Schiff proposed the Energy Cost Fairness and Reliability Act in the U.S. to require data centers over 50 megawatts to secure power and fund grid upgrades.
Senator Adam Schiff proposed the Energy Cost Fairness and Reliability Act in the USA to shift grid upgrade costs to AI data centers and expand FERC authority.
Bipartisan U.S. senators are considering a bill before the midterm elections that would shift more grid costs to data centers and accelerate energy infrastructure permitting.
The U.S. House passed data center electricity-cost legislation in Washington in 2026 as lawmakers and communities debated ratepayer protections, local authority, and facility restrictions.
Senator Jon Husted introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act on July 20 to make large data-center operators pay for grid and transmission upgrades rather than shifting costs to utility ratepayers.
Representative Suhas Subramanyam introduced four federal data center bills in Washington in 2026 covering siting, utility costs, resource measurement, and facility security.
Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon proposed a federal data center tax framework during the U.S. construction boom that would limit incentives and impose an excise tax.
Four Senate energy and environment leaders announced Wednesday in Washington that a bipartisan permitting bill would accelerate energy infrastructure reviews and require data centers to pay transmission costs.
The U.S. Senate may test the Ratepayer Protection Act next week in Washington, D.C., on requiring state regulators to consider standards for data centers to pay for grid upgrades.
Senator Josh Hawley introduced the No Tax Breaks for Data Centers Act in Washington, seeking to end Opportunity Zone tax benefits for data center investments.
9/17/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
Representatives Eugene Vindman, Kristen McDonald Rivet, and Don Davis introduced legislation in Congress to repeal tax breaks for large AI data center construction.
9/16/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
Representatives Kathy Castor and Gabe Evans introduced a nonbinding bill in Congress to encourage states to make data centers pay for electricity-grid upgrades.
Food & Water Watch urged the U.S. House to reject the Ratepayer Protection Act, arguing that the bill could accelerate hyperscale data center construction nationwide while increasing public grid, water and pollution costs.
Representative Suhas Subramanyam introduced the National Data Center Plan in the United States to regulate siting, allocate grid costs, standardize resource measurement, and protect nearby communities.
Food & Water Watch criticized H.R. 9340 in the United States for addressing data center infrastructure cost allocation without covering broader electricity, water, pollution, and community impacts.
Senator Mark Warner is proposing federal data center power, water, siting, and cost-allocation standards to protect Virginia communities and electricity ratepayers.
House Appropriations Committee members approved a bipartisan amendment in a 58 billion fiscal 2027 energy and water bill to give the Energy Department authority over data center water and energy efficiency.
In September, House Energy and Commerce Committee members pressed Republican leaders in Congress to advance legislation requiring data centers to cover electricity and water infrastructure costs.
Congressman Riley M. Moore is cosponsoring a federal bill introduced by Congressman Gabe Evans that would require data centers to fund incremental electricity infrastructure costs nationwide.
Congressman Eugene Vindman introduced the Smart Data Center Policy Act in Washington, D.C., to study relocating data center development toward industrial zones, transportation hubs, and military installations.
Congresswoman Hillary Scholten introduced two bills in Washington, DC, requiring greater data center water and energy disclosure and stronger federal cooling efficiency standards.
Sen. Ron Wyden proposed in a Senate Finance Committee white paper ending data-center tax incentives and taxing owners gross receipts across the United States.
8/10/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
Ron Wyden is pursuing a national data center tax plan in the United States, while critics point to Loudoun County, Virginia, tax revenues as evidence of local benefits.
Senate Republicans scheduled votes in Washington before the midterm elections on Jon Husted's bill encouraging regulators to make large power customers cover grid upgrade costs.
Senate lawmakers stalled a House-passed bill Thursday in Washington that would have states consider requiring large data centers to finance grid upgrades.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington on September 15, directing state utility regulators to consider requiring AI data centers to cover incremental electricity costs.
The U.S. House passed legislation Wednesday in Washington directing states to consider requiring data centers and other large-load customers to fund necessary grid upgrades.
9/16/2026 • Policy & Utility Planning • General
Reason Foundation / Max Gulker and Caden Rosenbaum44
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act to require large data-center developers in the United States to fund incremental generation, transmission, and distribution upgrades.
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam recently introduced a four-bill National Data Center Plan in the U.S. House to regulate siting, resource measurement, security, and grid costs.
9/11/2026 • Policy & Utility Planning • General
Arkansas Times / Kevin Freking and Austin Gelder44
The U.S. House approved legislation in Washington requiring regulators to consider full data-center infrastructure cost allocation, while Arkansas lawmakers examined Entergy's Google project in West Memphis.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington by a 417-3 vote, requiring large computational loads to address incremental grid and generation costs.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on a 417-3 vote, sending the data-center cost-allocation bill to the Senate amid nationwide ratepayer concerns.
The U.S. House and Senate are considering bipartisan legislation in 2025 to prevent expanding AI data centers from shifting electricity costs onto households and small businesses, with Ohio central to the debate.
Andrea Salinas introduced a federal bill in the United States that would tax electricity used by large data centers and fund housing, conservation, cleanup, infrastructure, and clean-energy programs.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington, D.C., on September 16, 2026, directing state regulators to consider making data centers pay full grid connection costs.
House Republican lawmakers, led by Speaker Mike Johnson's office, plan to hold a vote in Washington the following week on legislation addressing household electricity costs linked to data center expansion.
House lawmakers are preparing to vote next week in Washington on the Ratepayer Protection Act, which would require data centers to cover incremental grid upgrade costs.
The League of Conservation Voters urged lawmakers in the United States to strengthen the Ratepayer Protection Act before its scheduled vote, citing data center costs and environmental risks.
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam announced four bills Tuesday in Ashburn, Virginia, to impose national siting, electricity-rate and impact requirements on data centers.
In the United States, Democratic lawmakers are linking Republicans and expanded Opportunity Zone incentives to local voter opposition against data center growth ahead of midterm elections.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune urged data centers to provide their own power and utilities during remarks to a South Dakota television station as opposition grows nationwide.
Florida Rep. Byron Donalds introduced H.R. 9777 in 2020s-era legislation to require hyperscale AI data centers to generate power and secure water resources.
Mark Warner proposed federal rules for large AI data centers in Virginia, requiring public energy and water disclosure and linking tax benefits to efficiency standards.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee advanced H.R. 9340 on July 22, 2026 to shield U.S. ratepayers from grid cost increases tied to data center growth.
Brett Guthrie and the House Energy and Commerce Committee plan next-week votes on H.R. 9340 to limit data-center-driven electric utility bill increases.
Food and Water Watch and the Center for Biological Diversity criticize the Ratepayer Protection Act after House subcommittee action over data-center electricity and environmental impacts.
House Energy and Commerce Committee plans a vote on Ratepayer Protection Act to require state utilities to consider a large load standard for data center grid upgrades.
Gabe Evans and Kathy Castor introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act to require financial assurances and incremental cost recovery for 100 MW data center grid connections.
Castor and Evans introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act on June 19, 2026, to require state regulators to prevent ratepayer-funded grid upgrades for 100 MW+ data-center loads.
Congresswoman Kathy Castor and Rep. Gabe Evans introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act on June 19, 2026, to require state regulators to block ratepayers from funding grid upgrades for data-center loads.
The U.S. House approved a bill Wednesday in Washington recommending that AI data centers pay for new electricity and transmission infrastructure costs.
Senator Mark Warner plans new data center legislation for Virginia, using the Power for the People Act framework to require data centers to pay transmission and manage interconnection impacts.
Sen. Adam Schiff introduced the Energy Cost Fairness and Reliability Act to make U.S. data centers pay for grid upgrades and support peak-hour demand reductions.
In the US House, consumer advocates criticized the Ratepayer Protection Act after mid-June subcommittee progress and a delayed July 1 committee vote for weak ratepayer safeguards.
Food and Water Watch and the Center for Biological Diversity criticize the Ratepayer Protection Act for voluntary rate controls and accelerated NEPA-related review supporting U.S. datacenter expansion.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee advanced H.R. 6529 on July 21, 2026, requiring FERC in the United States to examine electricity cost allocation for large AI data-center loads.
9/9/2026 • Policy & Utility Planning • General
Reuters / Nichola Groom, Kanishka Singh and Nolan D. McCaskill40
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington, D.C., requiring state regulators to consider data center responsibility for incremental grid costs amid rising household electricity concerns.
The U.S. Senate blocked Sen. Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act in a 57-32 vote on Wednesday in Washington, leaving federal ratepayer safeguards for data center infrastructure costs unadvanced.
The Senate blocked Jon Husted's Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington, D.C., delaying legislation that would require large AI data centers to fund added grid infrastructure before the election.
In Washington on Thursday, Senate action on the Ratepayer Protection Act stalled after Martin Heinrich opposed Husted's bill and Bernie Moreno blocked Heinrich's alternative.
Senator Martin Heinrich blocked Senate approval in Washington on Thursday of the House-passed Ratepayer Protection Act, citing insufficient safeguards against data center electricity, water, and pollution costs.
Senator Jon Husted will seek Senate approval Thursday in Washington for legislation requiring states to consider making large data centers cover new generation and transmission upgrade costs.
The U.S. House passed bipartisan legislation on Wednesday in Washington encouraging state regulators to make data centers cover higher electricity costs linked to their power demand.
9/16/2026 • Policy & Utility Planning • General
The Sacramento Bee / Nichola Groom, Kanishka Singh and Nolan D. McCaskill40
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington on Wednesday, directing state regulators to consider charging data centers for incremental electricity infrastructure costs.
House Democrats led by Kristen McDonald Rivet introduced federal legislation in Washington to restrict data center tax incentives amid growing concerns about public costs and resource use.
9/16/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
The U.S. House approved a bill Wednesday in Washington requiring consideration of rates that make AI data centers cover new power and transmission costs.
The U.S. House approved legislation Wednesday in Washington recommending that state regulators make AI data centers pay for new electricity and transmission infrastructure.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington on Wednesday, directing state regulators to make large data center customers pay for new electricity infrastructure.
The U.S. House passed H.R. 9340 in Washington, D.C., requiring state regulators to make data centers pay for generation and grid upgrades serving large-load customers.
The U.S. House is expected to vote on the Ratepayer Protection Act, which would allow state regulators to make large AI data centers pay for related power infrastructure nationwide.
House Republican leaders scheduled a Tuesday vote in Washington on the bipartisan Ratepayer Protection Act, which would make technology companies fund infrastructure tied to data center development.
The U.S. House passed a bipartisan bill Wednesday in Washington requiring data center companies to fund generation and grid upgrades serving new facilities.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act on Wednesday in Washington, D.C., directing state regulators to consider assigning data centers some costs of new power generation.
House Republican leaders plan to advance the bipartisan Ratepayer Protection Act in Washington next week to address how data center demand affects electricity costs.
The U.S. House passed legislation Thursday requiring large data centers to fund related generation, transmission, and grid upgrades in Washington, D.C.
Representative Andrea Salinas introduced the Data Center Community Reinvestment Act in Washington, D.C., proposing a federal electricity tax on large data centers to finance community and infrastructure programs.
Democratic lawmakers introduced data center and AI tax proposals in Congress to finance worker-support and public employment programs amid concerns about automation and inequality.
U.S. House Science Committee advanced H.R. 9372 on June 26, 2026, directing NIST and DOE measurement research for data-center energy and water standards tied to AI training and inference.
Senate Democrats planned to block Jon Husted's data center electricity cost bill on Wednesday in Washington, which would ask state regulators to consider consumer rate protections.
Senate Democrats blocked the Ratepayer Protection Act on Wednesday in Washington, rejecting a proposal to have utility regulators consider assigning data center infrastructure costs to companies.
Senate Democrats blocked the Ratepayer Protection Act on Wednesday in Washington, arguing its voluntary standards would not ensure data center companies pay energy infrastructure costs.
Senate Republicans scheduled a procedural vote on a large-customer grid-cost bill before the midterm elections in Washington, amid data-center affordability concerns.
Representatives Chris Pappas, Kristen McDonald Rivet, and Don Davis introduced a federal bill that would restrict tax benefits for data centers in the United States.
9/17/2026 • Project Finance & Incentives • General
The U.S. House passed a bipartisan data center energy-cost bill on a 417-3 vote, urging state regulators nationwide to protect ratepayers as AI infrastructure expands.
The U.S. House on Wednesday approved legislation urging state utility regulators to make AI data centers cover new power and transmission costs nationwide.
The U.S. House approved a bill in Washington requiring state regulators to consider assigning AI data centers the full cost of new power and transmission infrastructure.
The U.S. House passed H.R. 9340 on Wednesday in Washington, directing state utility commissions to review rates for data centers exceeding 100 megawatts.
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam introduced four United States bills to govern data center siting, resource measurement, security, and grid costs amid rising compute demand.
House Republican leaders Mike Johnson and Steve Scalise plan a next-week vote in Washington on legislation requiring technology companies to fund infrastructure for energy-intensive data centers.
The U.S. House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act overnight in Washington, directing regulators to consider making AI data centers pay for power and transmission upgrades.