Ninth Circuit Rejects Youth Climate Suit
Coverage from Common Dreams, Reason, and others

Youth plaintiffs are challenging government energy policies that they say promote fossil fuels and worsen climate-related harms, but courts are largely rejecting broad lawsuits seeking system-wide remedies.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of Lighthiser v. Trump, finding that the alleged injuries were too difficult to trace to the challenged executive orders and that the requested injunction would require courts to supervise executive energy policy. A separate Wisconsin case reflects the same dispute over whether climate-related constitutional claims should be resolved by courts or through political and legislative processes.
The main update is a more specific appellate ruling: the Ninth Circuit has now affirmed dismissal of Lighthiser v. Trump, adding a clearer holding that the requested injunction would improperly put courts in charge of executive energy policy. The Wisconsin matter is also reframed more concretely as an appeal from dismissal into political processes.
