Biometric Data Privacy LitigationBiometric Data Privacy LitigationCoverage from Computerworld, WebProNews, and others
00/00/0000
DailyWeekly
Biometric data privacy litigation examines whether technology companies obtained meaningful consent before collecting or using identifiers such as voiceprints, how those identifiers are stored and shared, and whether they can be used in artificial-intelligence systems or other commercial technologies.
A major example involves Illinois lawsuits brought by journalists, podcasters, audiobook narrators, and voice actors against companies including Google, Amazon, Meta, Adobe, and ElevenLabs over alleged use of recordings to train voice models. The broader legal landscape also includes data breaches, re-identification, statutory notice requirements, settlements, and precedents under laws such as Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act.
Looking Back
202 Day Timeline
Articles published over time. Hover any bar for the period and its article count.
Lawsuits filed in Illinois, Washington, and other jurisdictions accuse Otter, Fireflies, Microsoft Teams, and Granola of recording meetings or processing biometric data without participant consent.
9/8/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Illinois residents filed proposed class actions against Walmart in 2026 in the Northern District of Illinois, alleging unlawful voiceprint collection during calls to Walmart stores.
9/2/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
On August 13, Judge Eumi K. Lee allowed Illinois biometric privacy and wiretap claims against Otter.ai to proceed in federal court in California over alleged voiceprint capture during virtual meetings.
8/20/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Judge Eumi K. Lee allowed plaintiffs to pursue major privacy claims against Otter.ai in California federal court over recording, voiceprint collection, and meeting-data retention.
8/18/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
A U.S. judge in Illinois in 2020s-era litigation denied MAC Cosmetics dismissal of a BIPA biometric virtual try-on class action over consent and identifiability.
6/23/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Nine BIPA class actions were filed in Chicago federal court against major technology firms for alleged AI training using voiceprints without written consent.
5/19/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Chicago plaintiffs filed BIPA class actions in federal court alleging Google and other companies trained voice AI models on recorded voices without written biometric consent.
Chicago-based plaintiffs filed nine federal BIPA class actions against major tech firms, alleging voice recordings were used to train AI models without written consent.
5/19/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Chicago plaintiffs filed nine federal class actions alleging technology companies violated Illinois BIPA by using voice recordings without written consent for AI training.
5/18/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Nine class-action lawsuits filed in Chicago federal court accuse Google, Amazon, Apple, and others of using voice recordings to train AI foundation models under Illinois BIPA.
5/16/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Nine BIPA class actions filed in Chicago federal court allege Google and others trained foundational voice models using recordings without written consent.
5/15/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Mondaq / Brian J. McGinnis, Mariana Renke, and Owen Agho70
Plaintiffs in California and Illinois sued Granola, Otter.ai, and Fireflies.ai over alleged unauthorized meeting capture, voiceprint generation, and related data use.
8/13/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
In Chicago federal court, journalists and voice actors filed nine class actions alleging major tech firms trained AI on voice recordings without Illinois BIPA written consent.
Illinois audio storytellers and journalists filed BIPA class-action lawsuits in the U.S. against multiple Big Tech firms over alleged voiceprint extraction for generative AI products.
Journalists sued Google in Illinois federal court in 2024 or 2025, alleging unauthorized training on personal voice recordings for voice replication AI systems.
Judge Eumi K. Lee will hear Otter.ai AI meeting-notes motion-to-dismiss arguments on 20 May 2026 in San Jose federal court after consolidation of ECPA and BIPA class actions.
Illinois residents Carol Krupke and Jeanne Thomas sued Walmart in Illinois over alleged AI-based voiceprint collection during customer-service calls made in 2025 and 2026.
Anila Bisha in Albania on September 11 2025 challenges the use of a biometric AI avatar on the e-Albania portal under GDPR like data protection standards.
Carol Krupke and Jeanne Thomas sued Walmart in Illinois federal court Tuesday, alleging AI-generated voiceprint collection during customer-service calls violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.
In Santa Clara County Superior Court, thousands of plaintiffs pursue Incognito mode tracking claims against Google after a late-2023 federal settlement.
6/19/2026 • Consumer Privacy & Digital Rights • General
Perplexity AI faces a proposed California class-action in the Northern District of California for alleged undisclosed sharing of user data and AI chats with Meta and Google.
4/26/2026 • Consumer Privacy & Digital Rights • General
On April 7, 2026, plaintiffs filed a Northern District of California putative class action alleging Sutter Health and others used Abridge AI scribe microphones to record and transmit confidential medical conversations without authorization.
4/27/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
A class action targeting Otter.ai meeting transcription highlights Wiretap Act and Illinois BIPA risks for workplace AI notetakers, with additional notice, audit, and cross-border obligations.
Perplexity privacy practices for query, device, and session data vary by account tier, with consumer training opt-out and enterprise zero data retention.
6/19/2026 • Privacy Technology & AI • General
Interesting15 articles · CI Score 45–59
Privacy and Data Security Insights / Beau Braswell58
A Northern District of California judge on August 13, 2026 allowed proposed class claims against Otter.ai to proceed over alleged consentless voiceprint collection during virtual meetings.
9/8/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
A federal class action in San Jose challenges Otter.ai and AI meeting notetaker practices under ECPA and California and Illinois privacy laws, with a May 20, 2026 motion-to-dismiss hearing scheduled.
4/27/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
A class-action lawsuit filed in San Francisco federal court accuses Perplexity AI of violating California privacy laws by sharing login-era conversation data via tracker downloads to Meta and Google.
4/2/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Perplexity AI was sued in San Francisco in a class action over alleged hidden trackers that transmitted user data to Meta and Google without explicit permission.
4/1/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Perplexity AI faces a proposed class action in San Francisco federal court alleging hidden trackers collected sensitive chatbot data, including financial and tax details, with alleged sharing to Meta and Google.
3/31/2026 • Consumer Privacy & Digital Rights • General
Mondaq / Caitlin Saladrigas, William F. Farley, and Brandon Lewis57
In July 2026, plaintiffs in California sued Granola and SoundHound AI over alleged interception of workplace and restaurant calls by generative AI systems without participant consent.
8/10/2026 • Regulation, Law & Enforcement • General
Otter.ai CEO Sam Liang describes enterprise meeting-data controls including Slack-like permissions and retention deletion while addressing recording-consent legal scrutiny.
Perplexity AI faces a class-action lawsuit filed over alleged unlawful data retention, shadow profiling, and third-party sharing after deletion requests.
Musicians filed Illinois BIPA class actions against Suno, Udio, and Google Lyria 3, alleging unauthorized voiceprint capture as federal judges prepare dismissal-motion rulings.
A lawsuit filed in 2020s-era AI privacy disputes alleges Perplexity AI, Google, and Meta shared incognito-mode chats with third parties for advertising revenue.
4/5/2026 • Consumer Privacy & Digital Rights • General
On August 22, Cara founder Jingna Zhang reported that a third scraping incident exposed approximately 123,000 images and user information on Academic Torrents.
8/23/2026 • Data Breaches & Exposure Events • General
Consumers and businesses sued OpenAI and Mixpanel in Northern California after a November 2025 Mixpanel cyberattack allegedly affected OpenAI accounts, but plaintiffs later dismissed the case.
5/14/2026 • Cybersecurity Tech (Privacy-Relevant) • General
Musicians filed proposed Illinois class actions against Suno, Uncharted Labs, and Google in 2020s-era litigation over alleged unauthorized voiceprint collection under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.
Perplexity AI faces a lawsuit in the 2020s over alleged unauthorized sharing of personal data with Meta and Google and related privacy and fraud claims.
3/31/2026 • Corporate Data Practices & Accountability • General
A class action lawsuit alleges ChatGPT shared user data with Google and Meta without consent, with the case ongoing and privacy risks tied to targeting.
5/16/2026 • Corporate Data Practices & Accountability • General